I agree something like a Remix labelling policy or "based off of Sugar/SoaS" might reduce confusion.
And if you are redistributing software created under FSF GPL, and modify it YOU HAVE TO INCLUDE/ make available source files of the change, so I'm guessing that the Fedora under the hood requires it, so I don't see how Sugar built on top of Fedora/ Linux could change that inherited policy/ licensing requirement. On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Luke Faraone <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 06:57, Tomeu Vizoso <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Btw, have we considered already allowing derivatives of SoaS be called >> SoaS remix or so like Fedora does? > > That would be a sensible policy to have. > > > -- > Luke Faraone > http://luke.faraone.cc > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > > -- DancesWithCars leave the wolves behind ;-) _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
