On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 15:19, Mel Chua <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Sean DALY <[email protected]> wrote: >> Mel ? > > The XS work done by Martin and others has been excellent, and XS > compatibility for SoaS is an important milestone to target, but we're > not there yet; same rationale as listed in > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2010-May/001274.html - what we > need to do is figure out a game plan for how the XS (in specific - and > other cool potential features in general) can be tested with SoaS > specifically so that we can make sure it works, which is a > prerequisite to supporting it and announcing it as a feature. > Generally speaking, since we're a community of volunteers, those who > handle the support questions determine what questions they'll actually > support. ;-) > > I added this to > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick_meetings#Agenda as a > topic to discuss: > > "The more general notion of a feature process (are Activities a > special type of feature?) on how things become supported/official > parts of SoaS - for instance, how would the XS, or an alternative > install method, become an official feature, and when?" > > This depends on whether people who are interested in seeing this as a > supported (and therefore publicized) feature in v4 are also willing to > step up and do the work -
Would be great if any of the SoaS pilots installed XS and gave feedback. Regards, Tomeu > --Mel > _______________________________________________ > Marketing mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
