Kenneth Crudup wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, jo3 wrote:
I can't imagine that this would pass anyone's non-obvious/non-trivial test.
Well, actually, I think it was a pretty good idea; back when I first heard about "pay for play" wireless, I wondered how they'd do the authentication/payment thing, and this is among the best and most transparent ways to do it.
... what I hope is the patent holder doesn't try to rape the licensees.
-Kenny
