But again, this is obvious and trivial. How can the USPTO be so simple minded? The trend toward software patents is dangerous, and it is a very slippery slope...

Joseph Hsieh wrote:
Although I don't agree with the "patent", I just wanted to clarify that
a web redirect is completely different then the implementation of a
gateway redirect commonly used in most wireless gateways.


A gateway redirect spoofs the DNS and "hijacks" the intended destination
page. It therefore acts as a guardian to OTHER sites' pages as opposed
to a website redirect where it can only protect its own content.


~Joseph

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Kelly
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SOCALWUG] New License Fee May Face Hotspot Operators

On 26 Jan 2004 at 20:30, Ronan Higgins, Cafe.com wrote:

Surely URL "capture" predates wi-fi and wireless hotspots? Wasn't it

used


in some traditional dial-up ISP NAS (Network Access Server)

applications?


Go to (for instance) any latimes.com story URL and it will redirect you
to a login page if you aren't already logged in. I'm sure other sites have been doing something
similar since very near the start of the web.



Reply via email to