On Jun 13, 2015 1:06 AM, "Pine W" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Perhaps we should take the discussion of how best to measure page
rendering performance to Wikitech. Would that be ok with you?

We could. Or maybe the research or analytics lists list would be better.

But should that block getting the SM out the door?

> I agree that there is value in continuity, but remember that Wikipedia
articles change over time, so unless someone is using a specific rev for
measuring every time that they make a change to how the page renders, then
there is likely to be at least some unreliability in the measurement.

Obviously we could double check this but I'd wager that Obama's cite count
would have trended upward in the last couple years. (so e.g. if we compared
older HHVM vs. newer HHVM with constant Obama rev the gains would be more
extreme than if we did older HHVM + older Obama vs. newer HHVM + newer
Obama)

Anyway, it should be technically feasible to run benchmarks for old
software again against the new revisions. In this case the author wasn't
actually comparing to past numbers. (I think...) Only generating his own
new numbers for a constant rev. And anyway, the comparison to old numbers
wouldn't be meaningful (without rerunning them) because hardware's not
constant.

> Technical factors like bandwidth and geolocation may also be involved in
skewing the validity of comparisons.

I can't imagine a scenario where that's relevant. Does anyone benchmark
specific articles over the public internet? vs. running the client on the
same local network as the server.

> For most citations, there appears to be a manually updated list here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_with_the_most_references

not just manually updated but each entry has its own separate update
date??? hrmmm, Obama is listed lower on that list than another article with
Obama in title…

-Jeremy

P.S. the recently released slow parse logs may be useful for choosing
articles to track over time. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98563
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to