There was a study a couple years ago that showed people are less likely to click on tweets with hashtags in them. But I think most people agree that well-used ones are helpful. One, MAYBE two per tweet.
On Thursday, October 29, 2015, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm by no means an expert, but I'd probably recommend a maximum of two > hashtags in a tweet. I think the vague ones don't work as well as the more > specific ones here. But Jeff is your guy for these kinds of things :) > > Joe > > On 29 October 2015 at 04:11, Pine W <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> In general, are there optimum numbers and kinds of hashtags? I imagine >> that there is research on this somewhere. (Agreed that hashtag soup causes >> cognitive load which may cause people to skip trying to understand what's >> being said.) >> >> Pine >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- Jeff Elder Digital communications manager Wikimedia Foundation 704-650-4130 @jeffelder <https://twitter.com/JeffElder> @wikipedia <https://twitter.com/wikipedia> The Wikimedia blog <https://blog.wikimedia.org/>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
