On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 10:05 -0400, Chad Smith wrote: > When MS does something "right" - (and I mean something everyone seems > to be mocking them for) - and we're doing it "wrong", then it's a > "trade-off". Either that, or it is explained away "it's a metric of > time of availablity of software"....
Its just more complex than you appear to be capable of dealing with, so not too much point in saying much more. > Stop lying to yourselves and admit that the monolithic design of OOo > isn't as good as it could be. I never said it was. In fact I said quite the opposite. Its not as good as it could be, I'm always looking for ways of improving things. I'd say that given the resources at their disposal, MS products are way short of what they could be too. You just defend them as being wonderful at every opportunity which is why you attract a lot of flak from those who know better. OOo is free bloat, MS office is non-free bloat. OOo has the potential to evolve better and at least open the door for better future products. MSO is a stagnating monopoly that will continue to be a stagnating monopoly. -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMSL
