Hi Remko! Remko Tronçon wrote: > Hi, > >> It seems to me that it might be worthwhile standardizing this. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What's there to standardize? > This sounds like a pure UI issue, left to the client developers to > decide how to display this (in the roster, or in a separate > subscriptions dialog). The same goes for MUCs and bookmarks, which > some clients decide to put in the roster, and others think this > belongs in a separate dialog to avoid confusion. I don't think there's > any good reason to standardize a UI? > > Or am I missing something?
Currently there is no way to specify a disco or pubsub node in a roster item. So let's say I am subscribed to a node "princely_musings" at the pubsub.shakespeare.lit pubsub service. I can add pubsub.shakespeare.lit to my roster, but I can't add a specific node there. So a new bookmarks category might be in order. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
