I recently came across this: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0173.html
Is this something that would be a candidate for what we talked about? Itay On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Remko! > > > > Remko Tronçon wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> It seems to me that it might be worthwhile standardizing this. > > > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What's there to standardize? > > This sounds like a pure UI issue, left to the client developers to > > decide how to display this (in the roster, or in a separate > > subscriptions dialog). The same goes for MUCs and bookmarks, which > > some clients decide to put in the roster, and others think this > > belongs in a separate dialog to avoid confusion. I don't think there's > > any good reason to standardize a UI? > > > > Or am I missing something? > > Currently there is no way to specify a disco or pubsub node in a roster > item. So let's say I am subscribed to a node "princely_musings" at the > pubsub.shakespeare.lit pubsub service. I can add pubsub.shakespeare.lit > to my roster, but I can't add a specific node there. > > So a new bookmarks category might be in order. > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > >
