Certain words and thought do inspire fear and
loathing without a great deal of sophisticated
analysis on the part of those who fear and loath--
like the reaction of the bull to the red cape. But
that's OUR problem not THEIR problem. That's to say-
-it's our problem if we want them to react to our
proposals rationally rather than emotionally, like
the bull. If we want to establish a dialog with them
and those they influence as if we were actually
serious about social credit, we should completely
avoid utilizing the offending words. It's just basic
public relations 101 and I should say--common sense.
You can be right about many things without having
that.
Bill,
The question remains; if Douglas never existed, and it had been YOU who'd developed the Social Credit concepts, and explained them without any reference to the "Protocols of Zion", or the philosophy behind the Theory of Rewards and Punishments as a cornerstone of the 'Semitic structure of society', or made any references whatsoever to the Jews themselves, what do you think the chances would be that those concepts would be seriously considered? And especially if the ultimate 'object' of them was still the triumph of the 'will to freedom' over the 'will to power'? From where do you think the font of the opposition to them, assuming there was any, would originate?
Joe
--^^--------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html --^^---------------------------------------------------------------
