Joe, you've completely missed the point.
--


Bill, 

The question remains; if Douglas never existed, and 
it had been YOU who'd developed the Social Credit 
concepts, and explained them without any reference to 
the "Protocols of Zion", or the philosophy behind the 
Theory of Rewards and Punishments
-----------------------------
This was Douglas' most important observation.
--



 as a cornerstone of the 'Semitic structure of 
society', or made any references whatsoever to the 
Jews themselves,
-----------------------------
Identifying that philosophy with the Jews was his 
biggest mistake.
-- 



what do you think the chances would be that those 
concepts would be seriously considered?
-----------------------------
A hell of a lot better than if they are identified 
with anti-semitism.  Even worse when they are 
identified with the Masons and Calvinists.  In the 
American perspective it's just ridiculous.  If you 
want to make friends and influence people you just 
don't do it.  There are several hundred thousand 
Masons in Texas alone, and millions of Calvinists--
the Presbyterians and so on.  How many social 
crediters are there?  I don't know any at all.

It baffles me that you can defend what is arguably an 
anti-semitic presentation in the context of the year 
2003.  I think you must have skipped Public Relations 
101.
--



 And especially if the ultimate 'object' of them was 
still the triumph of the 'will to freedom' over the 
'will to power'? From where do you think the font of 
the opposition to them, assuming there was any, would 
originate?

Joe
-----------------------------
By "the font" do you mean the Jews and Masons and 
Calvinists or do you mean the philosophy which has 
nothing specifically to do with the Jews, Masons and 
Calvinists as individuals, which would rule out the 
existence of a "font" except metaphorically?  Why not 
simply say the "font" is the "devil" and leave it at 
that?

Do you or do you not believe in free will?

If you do believe in free will it must follow that 
people can be persuaded.  That if there is an 
ingrained philosophy that we oppose--and there most 
certainly is--it is one more of nurture than nature.

For if it were nature the only solution would be the 
expulsion or extermination of the offenders, or 
perhaps selective breeding.

Then we're right back to the nazis, aren't we?
--




____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005

--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to