Oliver Hartkopp: > The problem is to define what a dlc > 8 provided by the CAN controller > (which IS a BUG inside the CAN controller!) should mean to the rest of > the data inside the registers containing the received CAN frame: > > - do we assume the rest to be a valid CAN frame? > - should we drop the frame ?
The Bosch CAN specification revison 2.0 part B says that a reaction to a DLC > 8 is not defined but the reference CAN model defines as de-facto standard the assumption that if DLC > 8 then DLC := 8. This is also done in RT-Socket-CAN. -- Sebastian _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
