On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:59:36PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/2011 02:13 PM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> On 10/06/2011 11:26 AM, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> >>>>> 2. 'can-utils' containing the content of the current SVN
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - use the integrated wiki functionality of GitHub for documentation (
> >>>>> https://github.com/features/projects/wikis)
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we need a separate project to handle the kernel and utilities?
> >>>
> >>> I'm for separation of the kernel and utilities, so that distro
> >>> maintainers can pick the latest package and include it in their software
> >>> repos. As you say, kernel repo is mainly interesting for backward
> >>> compatibility. can-utils should get version number and man pages.
> >>
> >> I was thinking about different repositories under the same project.
> >>
> > Any of both solutions imply a seperation of tools & kernel code. Good!
>
> OK, let's start with the mailing lists. I think there is consensus to
> move to a list named "linux-can" on "vger.kernel.org". Any objections?
>
> BTW: what is the procedure to get such a mailing list, e.g. whom should
> we contact? Unfortunately, I did not find any useful link on the internet.
It is David Miller that setup new mailings lists on vger.
He is usually very prompt doing so.
My vote on <socket...@vger.kernel.org> - as this is socketcan specific.
And the "linux" prefix is redundant...
Sam
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
