On 10/13/2011 11:10 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >> I think it's a good idea to import the berlios svn subtree containing >> the can-utils into the git repo on the new server. The git history looks >> better if we convert the svn usernames to a proper author field, e.g.: >> "John Developer <john.develo...@example.com>". > > Yep, as described also in "Importing from SVN" at > > http://savannah.gnu.org/maintenance/UsingGit
Yes, looks good. A very nice thing about git-svn is, that you can inport a sub-tree from svn to git. >> Urs, Oliver, Wolfgang and all other contributors, what's your preferred >> email? > > Wolfgang Grandegger <w...@grandegger.com> :) That's the address I've already in my list. > From that description it also seems that we can push only to one git > repository per project. This again rises the question how to handle and > name the can-utils and can-kmods. I see the following possibilities: > > 1. *One* project named "socketcan" or "linux-can" for both. In the git > repo we could then store all socketcan related code in: > > can-utils/... The CAN Utils > can-lib/... Eventually A Socketcan library, might be > integrated into can-utils > kernel/... Out-of-tree kernel modules for 2.6 and 3.x > kernel-2.4/... Old kernel modules for 2.4 > > 2. *Two* different projects named "can-utils" and "can-kmod". At least two repos, one for the userspace one for the kernel. Maybe even more then one userspace repo. cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
