On Feb 15, 2008, at 12:04 AM, Bill Maas wrote: > On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:51 -0800, Trevor Talbot wrote:
>> The thing that started this thread is apparently a set of holes, not >> a header. It's unreasonable to expect official documentation for it. > The thing that started this and a few other threads is there not being > a board doc. If you substitute "unpopulated headers" (as I copied from > Bernd's text in my hurry) with "various connectors" the story remains > exactly the same. If there is a board doc, it will at least be clear > what is a board feature and what isn't. No-one has asked such > questions about net4[58]x boards, as far as I can remember. I was actually reinforcing two points there. One was "non-features would not be documented", but the second was the fact that what actually did start this thread is curiosity about such an undocumented thing. It got hijacked to discuss the lack of a manual, but a manual wouldn't answer the question anyway. _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
