On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 09:53, Michael Sierchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a basic network naivete problem, not a hardware problem.
To expound, you generally cannot have multiple ethernet interfaces on the same subnet. There are ways around it (bonding, multipath, etc.), but given two equally precise routes, the standard default is to choose the first one. Given your routing table below, all traffic destined for the 192.168.10.0/24 subnet will exit through eth0. Traffic to the addresses on eth1-3 will appear to return from the eth0 address. 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth3 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.9 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
