Yes it will be more lightweight but of course at the cost of limited options. I'm running basically everything off of my 5501: Apache (mostly for Horde/(d)imp), MySQL (for wordpress), postfix, spampd, bind, dhcpd, tor, squid, privoxy, Samba, arpd, ntpd, nfsd and inetd to name the important ones. But I also have screen session with irssi running most of the time. 512MB is a lot if you don't run X. Kind regards, Alex.
----- Message from [email protected] --------- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:33:19 -0700 From: Ed Flecko <[email protected]> Subject: [Soekris] Would a net5501 reliably host a web site? To: [email protected] > Thank you all! > > Hey Will - Lighttpd might use less resources (but I can't imagine that > much where performance would really suffer, would it?), but > "hardening" Apache has just got to be more flexible...I would think. > > Yes? No? > > Ed > ----- End message from [email protected] ----- ======================================================================== # _ __ _ __ http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 # # / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _ [email protected] \n +491776461165 # # / / _ `/ _ `/ / / // / ' \ Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux # # /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/ Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / Linux / MacOS-X # # /___/ x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k ARM9: EPOC EV6 # ======================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------- cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs.. _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
