On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:30:17 -0400, Steve Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 04/14/2011 12:12 PM, David Alexander wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:05:47 -0400, Steve Clark<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 04/14/2011 10:04 AM, Marc Balmer wrote: >>>> Am 13.04.11 04:08, schrieb Ryan Whelan: >>>>> >>>>> I really want to know the reasons for the decision, not start a flame >>>>> war- I promise >>>> >>>> Here is why _we_ use *BSD: Because the license matters for us. >>> >>> I guess that attitude is ok if you always want to be a taker and never a >>> giver. >> >> >> This thread was moving along nicely. There were interesting and >> varied responses without any devolving into the religious debate the >> OP asked to avoid. Until Steve Clark came along. The rest of this >> topic will likely be useless now. >> >Til I came along???? I only responded to someone who complained about the GPL >vs BSD license. >I didn't bring it up!!!! No, you threw out the first personal attack against someone who was stating why they chose to use BSD just because you didn't like the philosophy behind their reason. There was no "complaining" in his post, just an explanation that the difference in licensing terms was his deciding factor. _______________________________________________ Soekris-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
