On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
Mitja Muženič <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> So the current situation is:
> OpenBSD 5.1 and earlier - no Enhanced Speedstep control for
> net6501-50 and 6501-70, so they only run at 600MHz.
> OpenBSD 5.2 - Enhanced Speedstep control for net6501-50 and 6501-70,
> but the initial display of the clock frequency after reboot is
> wrong. Blindly setting hw.setperf=100 will make the CPUs run at
> nominal 1000 and 1600MHz respectively.
> OpenBSD 5.3 (to be released) - Enhanced Speedstep control works and
> the initial display is correct - e.g. " hw.cpuspeed=601". Setting
> hw.setperf=100 is still needed to make the CPUs work at their
> nominal speed.
> 
> I don't know how it is with other operating systems but it's safe to
> presume that unless your OS actively sets the CPU to the high speed
> state your net6501-50 and net6501-70 units will be severely
> underclocked. net6501-30 runs at fixed 600MHz and has no Enhanced
> Speedstep capability.

On FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (i386) changing dev.cpu.0.freq (default:
600) has no effect; e.g. building a kernel takes approx. 2,5 hours (at
600 MHz and 1600 MHz). I've also removed "device cpufreq" from my
kernel.

In comparison to my Atom Netbook (N270 @1.6GHz) my net6501-70 performs
rather slow. :-(

Is there a patch for FreeBSD?

I will try OpenBSD-current soon.

-- 
Herbert
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to