David Ruggiero <[email protected]> wrote:

> So from this discussion, as far as I can tell,
> I have a choice of _four_ different OpenBSD kernels that could
> legitimately be booted on my net6501 and would probably run:
> 
> 32-bit i386 uniprocessor
> 32-bit i386 SMP
> 64-bit amd64 uniprocessor
> 64-bit amd64 SMP

OpenBSD/i386 and /amd64 are different architectures, so the userland
is different, not just the kernel.  But yes, all of the above do
run on the net6501.

> A different company than Soekris might do some quick testing, or at
> least provide some pithy engineering insight and give its customers a
> quick rundown from their point of view on the advantages and
> disadvantages of 32 vs 64bit and non-smp vs smp - whether in general,
> or for specific common application needs.

I don't expect Soekris to comment on 32 bs 64-bit, because the Intel
CPUs used in the net6501 officially do not support 64-bit mode.
Yes, it happens to work fine, but that's not something you can
guarantee, much less advertise.  Now that public attention has been
drawn to the issue, I wonder if Soeren might have to "fix" it.  Oh
well.

Now that Intel has announced the new Silvermont Atoms with all the
goodies (AES-NI, RDRAND, and of course 64-bit mode), I'm wondering
how long it will take for these to trickle through to Soekris-format
boxes.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to