the number of bits.
Larger number of bit but high leakage is not as good as a DAC with
smaller number of bits and very little leakage and overshoots.
Reading the specs is an art in itself. Sometimes what they don't specify
is equally as important.
On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:45 -0400, Robert McGwier wrote:
> The performance of the 9951 is exceeded by the 9959 at the cost of a 500
> MHz clock. Do not be fooled by the smaller DAC size or the smaller
> accumulator, etc. Read the specs.
>
>
> 73's
> Bob
> N4HY
>
>
>
> mdgolfbum wrote:
> --- snip ---
> > The dual 9951 should give the best currently available spur
> > performance and a stable quadrature output.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---snip ---
> > thoughts?
> >
> > jim ab3cv
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "soft_radio" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
