Personally I refuse to call it the Tayloe detector, nothing against
Mr Tayloe, I have met him several times and he is a nice fellow.

But like it's been mentioned before there is a lot of prior art, that
patent should not have been issued by the patent office, they did not
do their homework. I personally read about it in the late 70's long
before the patent was even dreamed up of.

That patent existing throws too much cold water on development in the
field, the large companies will not risk a patent fight, and just
skip the technology.


At 10:49 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
>Helo,
>We Japanese HAM know Merigo method is earlier than Talyoe detector.
>Please visit this site.
>
>http://ja2kai.ld.infoseek.co.jp/merigo.htm
>
>JA7TDO
>----- Original Message ----- >
> > 2.  What exactly is legal status of the Tayloe mixer?  Motorola owns
> > the patent (US # 6230000).  There may be a great deal of prior art
> > that might render the patent without merit but I don't want to get
> > sued over a hobby.  Did Flex-Radio license this patent from Motorola?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


Cecil Bayona
KD5NWA
www.qrpradio.com

"Windows the worlds most successful software virus"



SPONSORED LINKS
Ham radio Craft hobby Hobby and craft supply


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to