even dan refers to the fact that it is prior art on emails sent to this reflector.
the name tayloe sticks anyway. call it a QSD. jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "KD5NWA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [soft_radio] Tayloe Mixer versus Wideband ADC for SDR Personally I refuse to call it the Tayloe detector, nothing against Mr Tayloe, I have met him several times and he is a nice fellow. But like it's been mentioned before there is a lot of prior art, that patent should not have been issued by the patent office, they did not do their homework. I personally read about it in the late 70's long before the patent was even dreamed up of. That patent existing throws too much cold water on development in the field, the large companies will not risk a patent fight, and just skip the technology. At 10:49 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote: >Helo, >We Japanese HAM know Merigo method is earlier than Talyoe detector. >Please visit this site. > >http://ja2kai.ld.infoseek.co.jp/merigo.htm > >JA7TDO >----- Original Message ----- > > > 2. What exactly is legal status of the Tayloe mixer? Motorola owns > > the patent (US # 6230000). There may be a great deal of prior art > > that might render the patent without merit but I don't want to get > > sued over a hobby. Did Flex-Radio license this patent from Motorola? > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Cecil Bayona KD5NWA www.qrpradio.com "Windows the worlds most successful software virus" Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Home is just a click away. Make Yahoo! your home page now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/DHchtC/3FxNAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
