I'm using the term sideband in a DC IQ receiver the exact same way KK7B has in the Literature for nearly 15 years ... I'm puzzled at what the confusion is ..
JR --- In [email protected], "CHARLES HUTTON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alberto: > > Apparently we are having language problems, as Jean-Claude has understood > me. And of course I fully understand the process of cancellation via > applying a Hilbert transform to an orthogonal channel. > (That's very relevant to my job.) > > Now that the waters have been muddied linguistically, I wonder what the > original poster's meaning was? > > > Chuck > > >From: "i2phd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: [soft_radio] Re: Softrock as receiver back end > >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:14:17 -0000 > > > >--- In [email protected], "jabauzit" <jabauzit@> wrote: > > > > > > I think that the problem comes from the term sideband. With SDRs the > > > term sideband is used as sideband relative to the LO frequency. In a > > > superhet it is refered as the image. > > > I think that Chuck understood the term sideband as sideband relative > > > to the supressed carrier of a SSB transmission. He wrote "using the > > > I-Q data to achieve IMAGE suppression" and "True SIDEBAND suppression > > > would involve using a Costas Loop". > > > > > > Jean-Claude PJ2BVU > > > > Well, if for sideband you intend the sideband relative to the > >suppressed carrier in a SSB signal, then I don't understand what you > >have to suppress... it was already suppressed at the transmitting > >side... but maybe it's my fault, as here it is already 12:15 AM and I am > >sleepy...:-) > > > >Good night everybody.. > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > > > >
