Alberto: Apparently we are having language problems, as Jean-Claude has understood me. And of course I fully understand the process of cancellation via applying a Hilbert transform to an orthogonal channel. (That's very relevant to my job.)
Now that the waters have been muddied linguistically, I wonder what the original poster's meaning was? Chuck >From: "i2phd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: [soft_radio] Re: Softrock as receiver back end >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:14:17 -0000 > >--- In [email protected], "jabauzit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that the problem comes from the term sideband. With SDRs the > > term sideband is used as sideband relative to the LO frequency. In a > > superhet it is refered as the image. > > I think that Chuck understood the term sideband as sideband relative > > to the supressed carrier of a SSB transmission. He wrote "using the > > I-Q data to achieve IMAGE suppression" and "True SIDEBAND suppression > > would involve using a Costas Loop". > > > > Jean-Claude PJ2BVU > > Well, if for sideband you intend the sideband relative to the >suppressed carrier in a SSB signal, then I don't understand what you >have to suppress... it was already suppressed at the transmitting >side... but maybe it's my fault, as here it is already 12:15 AM and I am >sleepy...:-) > >Good night everybody.. >73 Alberto I2PHD > >
