Hi Fabricio, No, it does not get regenerated. And I believe the point array starts from index 0. In 2012, it will return 0, 0, -1 #QNB for invalid point. In 2013, we have corrected it to become 0,0,0.
Regards, Chris Chia Softimage QA Analyst On 7 May, 2012, at 11:07 AM, "Fabricio Chamon" <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, thanks for taking a look at it. > > Well, maybe I'm missing the concept of point index then. > Is it correct to assume a Point Index is an incremental value assigned to > points, and that there's no gaps between it's values? > > example, a pointcloud with 5 particles has point indices 1,2,3,4 and 5. > if I delete any 3 of them, now I get regenerated indices: 1,2 and 3. > > now if this is correct, how can a point be unavailable? > > sorry if I completely misunderstood the whole idea of point indices...
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
