I never said I agreed with the wording. :) I was merely pointing out what I think the rationale was behind it as it's really focused on stuff like interop workflows. It is somewhat high level though, and personally I'm not a fan of these 'magazines'
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Thivierge Sent: 10 September 2012 15:43 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: In case you missed it.. Even I don't buy that Graham. Only particles? Why not Nodal based systems for particles, topology, and animation? Sounds better to me than just particles. It can go even further than that but lets just stick with the selling point of ICE. There use that and cut me a hefty check for helping out the marketing dept. :D -------------------------------------------- Eric Thivierge http://www.ethivierge.com On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Graham Bell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Perhaps worth pointing out that this is a Entertainment Creation 'Suites' magazine and of the course the two main flavours (Ultimate aside) for the Suites are Maya and Max. And therefore the three packages shown in the image are all including in the Maya/Max Suites, hence the reason for trying to show their value to those respective users. From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold Sent: 10 September 2012 15:08 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: In case you missed it.. This is the kind of stuff that makes me really dislike Autodesk: http://yfrog.com/h0t6exxtj I'm glad to know Softimage is a particle system that has single-step interoperability with the apps in the "Areas of Excellence" (Max and Maya). -Paul
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
