How about simply the idea of marketing Softimage?  Not marketing it to
Max or Maya users to get them to switch, or as a way to get them to
buy suites.  Just market it to anyone looking to purchase a 3d app
period.  Basic equal marketing for an equal app.

Simply adding the Softimage suite from Japan to the rest of the world
would be a big step forward.

-PG


Phalangically transmitted through an iPad to your cerebral cortex.

On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Maurice Patel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rolling up my sleeves :)
> If you don't know me, I (still) head Product/Industry Marketing for M&E and 
> have posted a couple of times on the forum about our strategy.
> First. I'd like to respond to the link to the campaign item that started this 
> thread http://yfrog.com/h0t6exxtj:
> Although I can't say I am particularly fond of that diagram myself (it's 
> rather ugly), it actually came out of a study commissioned from a third party 
> research company that hired 3ds Max and Maya animators to evaluate what (if 
> any) value Softimage, MotionBuilder and Mudbox offered to Maya and 3ds Max 
> users as a means of determining the value of Suites - so we used it in the 
> Suites Campaign.
> The specific purpose of the campaign is to encourage 3ds max and Maya users 
> to buy Suites; so yes it focuses only on the areas of these applications that 
> offer significant value above and beyond what Maya and 3ds max can already 
> do. It is not meant to be an exhaustive description of those applications 
> capabilities.
> I know Autodesk Marketing is often hard to fathom - heck it is for us too, 
> but if we want Softimage to survive we (the marketing team) need to work with 
> the system not against it. We are not going run a campaign to switch Maya or 
> 3ds max users to Softimage - that would kill our business and create a 
> massive customer outcry for no real gain. Any expectation that we would do 
> that is unrealistic. So, if we are not going to do that, then we need to find 
> a better way to get people to adopt Softimage and, while not perfect, Suites 
> has been our best bet yet.
> Given that, take a pause and ask objectively "where is Autodesk's real 
> opportunity here?" Is it to run a campaign encouraging Softimage users to add 
> Maya (or 3ds max) to their toolset? Or vice versa? Which would (1) be the 
> better business decision and (2) get Softimage in the hands of more users?
> You will probably reach the same conclusion we did.
> In terms of overall exposure, I am not going to deny that Softimage is less 
> visible than when it was part of Avid. Then Softimage was run as its own 
> entity and there was 100% focus on one(ish) product (ish because there was 
> actually a few more than one). That is not the case now. Autodesk runs its 
> business pretty much as one centralized operation for the sale of efficiency 
> and scale and so M&E competes with hundreds of other Autodesk products for 
> mind share when it comes to marketing investment and visibility - and M&E is 
> not the largest part of Autodesk's business. This dictates exactly how much 
> coverage M&E gets and how many and what products we can feature on things 
> like the home page. Oddly enough though, the bulk of our web traffic actually 
> goes directly to the product pages so it can be argued that this specific 
> point is moot anyway. But yes, visibility is reduced and suffers as a 
> function of a given product's ranking in the Autodesk product stack.
> Believe me, I have similar discussions with Flame users who also believe we 
> have abandoned marketing Flame. Deep down most of this is related to our 
> centralized marketing processes discussed above and not to any individual. 
> This is not going to change nor is it clear that any alternative could be 
> successful and/or profitable. Or at least not in the sense one might expect. 
> In the long run Suites and Cloud Services are changing the way Autodesk views 
> products but not in the traditional sense. My team's constant challenge is 
> therefore to figure out how to increase visibility within the systems we have 
> - be it through more aggressive social media strategies (why we launched the 
> Softimage Facebook page) or other methods. While the good old days have 
> nostalgic value (and yes we remember when Discreet Logic had its own website, 
> as did Alias and Softimage, with their own dedicated Marketing resources), we 
> have long realized we can never go back to those days. The battles have move!
 d on to new battlefields - but it does continue!
> Maurice
>
> Maurice Patel
> Autodesk : Tél:  514 954-7134
>
>
> <winmail.dat>

Reply via email to