Arnold has the "maketx" commandline utility to make .tx files out of
textures. At work we made a batch job for the farm that converts a scene's
textures to (mipmapped) .tx for Arnold's sake.

In the renderer options somewhere there is a toggle to make Arnold use .tx
files if it finds them in the same root as the texture paths. It's pretty
handy.


On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote:

> its not for softimage, its for arnold. arnold uses open image io which
> does support automatic mip mapping but we dont use it much... i can't be
> sure that softimage uses available mip map levels for displaying in the
> viewport.
>
> s
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Eric Cosky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This is the most intriguing comment in this thread to me – I never
>> considered using images with mipmaps for rendering in Softimage. I didn’t
>> realize any file formats outside of DDS even supported them, and it never
>> crossed my mind that Softimage would use them for rendering if available. I
>> assumed the renderer would create them on the fly as needed, which it seems
>> would only incur a small load time cost with the same end result. I’d be
>> interested in hearing more about why & how people typically setup and use
>> mipmaps for Softimage, in particular, is there any practical difference in
>> the resulting image or time of rendering? ****
>>
>> Thanks****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steven Caron
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 15, 2012 6:12 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: 16 bit tif from photoshop not working in softimage?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> tifs are perfectly fine... they support many bit depths, mip mapping, and
>> tiling. i did a comparison to exr as a texture format years ago and
>> OIIO/Arnold liked the tif files better.
>>
>> s****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Simon van de Lagemaat <
>> [email protected]> wrote:****
>>
>> What do people here use as a standard format?  I always thought tiff
>> was the least offensive format but after running into some issues with
>> the byte order bs we're wondering if png's might be better?****
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Gene Crucean
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > .tif's =  the devil
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ... that is all
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Gene Crucean - Emmy winning - Oscar nominated VFX Supervisor / iOS-OSX
>> > Developer / Filmmaker / Photographer
>> > ** Freelance for hire **
>> > www.genecrucean.com
>> >
>> > ~~ Please use my website's contact form on www.genecrucean.com for any
>> > personal emails. Thanks. I may not get them at this address. ~~
>> >****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>

Reply via email to