wow, very interesting! 2 hours to constrain 2800 nulls - so thats only 15 nulls per minute , bit of a joke! Am sorry for suggesting it, I really did not appreciate how slow it is and thought the menu call to ICE > Kinematics > transform objects by particles might have been more optimised than Alan's Python script.. definitely not! maybe its written in VBscript or...? :)
I guess the serious rigger constrainers are best to stick with Python scripted solutions for now. Also couldnt understand how it took so long as the example I made with few hundred wasnt that tedious to wait, so testing it out on a grid quick with 2400 nulls , the progress bar is already past 1/4 way though and its only been 5 minutes... oh wait screens frozen and gone white - will let you know final time if it finishes, just going for lunch! :D its obviously not multithreaded as only 1 core out of 24 is in use for this procedure - what a waste! cheers Rob On 11 January 2013 12:47, Nuno Conceicao <[email protected]>wrote: > took nearly 2 hours to apply the transform to all the nulls, after, to tes
