0.0.05 rather
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Hans Payer <[email protected]> wrote: > Please someone explain, > > How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number > increment of 0.0.03? > > 2014 SP1 = 12.1.94 > 2014 SP2 = 12.1.99 > > Should itnot have been at least 12.2.xx? > > You can blame my code but I always have relied on point version to > differenciate versions.In this case they both return 12.1. > > It has always been consistent at least since 2010. Why different now? > > Hans >
