looks alright to me. the build number change tell me SP2 is indistinguishable from SP1 except it's got some code change that caused 5 builds but dont affect API or scene file. However, if SP1 is indeed a 11.1 instead of 11.0, then there must have been API change or something that affects the version of the scene file.
you can see other examples of build numbers here.. http://xsisupport.com/2012/07/18/softimage-build-versions 2011 SP2 changed persistence. goddamn shader persistance bug and the only time we've done a SP2 at ADSK On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Hans Payer <[email protected]> wrote: > 0.0.05 rather > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Hans Payer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Please someone explain, >> >> How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number >> increment of 0.0.03? >> >> 2014 SP1 = 12.1.94 >> 2014 SP2 = 12.1.99 >> >> Should itnot have been at least 12.2.xx? >> >> You can blame my code but I always have relied on point version to >> differenciate versions.In this case they both return 12.1. >> >> It has always been consistent at least since 2010. Why different now?
