yup, i was missing something :) add me to the list of +1's
On 13 September 2013 18:10, Daniel Brassard <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand Eric predicament. The objectview by default open to > perspective, if you tick orthographic, the objectview does not retain the > setting when closed and their is not current setting in the attributes to > change it in the preference setting either. > > > http://download.autodesk.com/global/docs/softimage2014/en_us/sdkguide/si_cmds/ObjectViewAttributes.html > > I tried the SetValue("preferences.objectview. ....) way and it is not > accessible. > > +1 on Eric request. > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Jon Swindells <[email protected]> wrote: > >> wouldn't a relational view with max instance prop set to 1 be the way to >> go ? >> >> if you are popping it up through script i don't see a problem with >> getting the camera properties also, >> you'd have an easy to search for named singleton if you need it >> >> or am i missing the obvious here ? >> >> >> On 12 September 2013 20:40, Eric Thivierge <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I'd like to open the object view and have it set to ortho automatically. >>> For creating and editing bone chains and other things that need to lay flat >>> on the plane between root, 2nd bone and effector orthographic is usually >>> best. I'd like to not have to add additional objects or edit objects >>> already in the scene but looks like I'll have to do so. >>> >>> If I could get at the camera under the view I could automatically set >>> the ortho so the user doesn't have to and I don't change anything else in >>> the scene and I can create a simple and streamlined workflow for the tools >>> I'm building. >>> >>> >>> On September-12-13 1:35:16 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote: >>> >>>> there is no technical reason for that attribute return value to be so >>>> terse, but I'm not sure exactly what you need. maybe you need a user >>>> pref to the default camera mode, or maybe you want to open the object >>>> view with a scene camera that you control (which should be possible >>>> with setattribute) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Eric Thivierge < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Should I even bother logging a feature request or is it something that >>>>> isn't >>>>> possible because they are dynamic and tied to the view? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jon Swindells >> [email protected] >> > > -- Jon Swindells [email protected]
