If it is for lipsync only and need auto lip sync solution you can always export mouth controls only from face robot onto your characters. Meaning something lie:
Create you own mesh Rig it in face robot create lopsync in face robot scene, separated from the rest of your mesh export as emdl only jaw and lips nulls, couple big yellow ones. autolipsync in facerobot scene, plot and exprot action for mouth cntrls only then have imprated those controls to your the rest of the rig character, import ploted action ad there you go.. did that recently for like 2.5 minutes of lip sync and at the end doesn't look bad at all. It sounds more complicated than it actualy is. On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Steven, > > > http://www.facefx.com/documentation/2013.3/W250 > > > gives a good idea about a default character setup. > > I glanced through some of tutorials and clicked through the docs. > > I can see why FaceFx can provide more in-depth control and possibly > allows superior results when fed with the audio and the text to analyse. > > The reason why I´m still leaning towards voice-o-matic is pretty nicely > summed up in this example of storing keyframe data on "proxies": > > (Voice-o-matic) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71hp0z0oUvc > > That comes close to the workflow I expect to face. > > Getting in help with the blocking in of the lip-sync, possibly even before > phoneme shapes and the personalisation of a character can be regarded > finalized. > > For lack of a better description. > > Thanks again for the pointing to facefx, the site has very good info. > > Cheers, > > tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12.02.2014 21:07, Steven Caron wrote: > >> i just went through this, i couldn't get that good of results out of >> voice o matic. i ended up using FaceFX. >> >> http://facefx.com/ >> >> the pipeline for FaceFX is a bit tricky, since it sits on top of fbx, but >> they have an API which you can extract the auto lip sync curves without >> using FBX back into softimage. the >> results i got with FaceFX were awesome right out of the gate, i only >> needed to add one extra new target/shape. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Tim Leydecker <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> can you share your findings when using voice-o-matic >> >> from http://www.di-o-matic.com/__products/ < >> http://www.di-o-matic.com/products/> >> >> >> maybe even compared to FaceRobot? >> >> Voice-O-Matic seems to help a lot in blocking in a lip sync >> audio/blendshapes animation using a basic set of 8-9 blendshapes. >> >> "Only" having to setup aprox. 10 good shapes to get to a lip sync >> antimation track ready for further finetuning seems very desireable. >> >> I am under the impression that FaceRobot would require more setup >> work, >> especially when facing an alien, e.g. a not really humanoid basemesh. >> >> Can you recommend an alternative program to voice-o-matic. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> tim >> >> >> >> >> >>
