I don't think they would want to support that beast for untrained people. Or if they would, it would cost a tremendous pile of money. Who's up for that?
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Ed Manning <[email protected]> wrote: > rather than thinking about Maya (which is no more the future than > Softimage, maybe less), why don't we think about what might be needed in a > worthy successor to both? > > This might be a good place to start: > > http://rhythm.com/labs/ > > > Maybe someone could get R&H's new owners to commercialize this. Or sell > to the Foundry? > > >
