much like a couple of other apps i could mention, if you wanted to do work of that calibre
a _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angus Davidson Sent: 28 February 2014 17:45 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: successor animation software While its very impressive you would need a small fleet of TD's to keep it shipshape;) _____ From: Vladimir Jankijevic [[email protected]] Sent: 28 February 2014 07:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: successor animation software I don't think they would want to support that beast for untrained people. Or if they would, it would cost a tremendous pile of money. Who's up for that? On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Ed Manning <[email protected]> wrote: rather than thinking about Maya (which is no more the future than Softimage, maybe less), why don't we think about what might be needed in a worthy successor to both? This might be a good place to start: <http://rhythm.com/labs/> http://rhythm.com/labs/ Maybe someone could get R&H's new owners to commercialize this. Or sell to the Foundry? This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the contrary.
