I hope there is a company or someone else who can hire all SI developers
and make another next generation 3D software. I remember when Lightwave
shut down years ago, and they are back in industry and shows great stuff,
and even Modo. I really hope there is a company or someone hires SI dev
members...


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Kim
Animation Director & Professional 3D Generalist
http://www.danielkim3d.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------




On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote:

> Softimage, like SideEffect, 3DSMax and the rest are small teams of very
> clever developers, 8-12 is the normal number of developers for any app...
> that is a very small cost compared with the cost of advertising and PR,
> believe me.
>
> Regarding this implied direct relationship between pace of development and
> resources, it is so so obscene it is insulting to say that. By that rule
> all the software portfolio Autodesk manages hinders everything they do,
> let's face it, they have lots of products.
>
> If the case is pace of development just hire a few more good guys and make
> sure the effort does not go to waste by not promoting it well.
>
> The issue I have is that something does not add up... I still don't
> understand the decision and the more I think about it, the more suspicious
> it becomes.. .does not even seem a coordinated well put plan that is
> causing all this storm (all the handling has been awful and big companies
> tend to handle these things with utmost care as it casts a horrible light
> to the brand itself)
>
> Just look at how Apple handled Shake, they discontinued it but offer the
> possibility of buying the source code and carry on using it, it was bad but
> at least was a clean exit. Also helps that nuke was ready for prime time so
> felt like moving forward instead of moving back to the 80s with Maya.
>
> Jordi Bares
> [email protected]
>
> On 8 Mar 2014, at 11:05, Cristobal Infante <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> it's a bad decision in the eyes of who?
>
> They didn't really buy softimage because they thought is a software
> they could improve any further, they were actually really buying US the
> users. Some people call it killing the competition, a chess move.
>
> If xsi only had 8-10 developers, than It doesn't take a math genius to
> figure out that they were obviously making money with it. Maybe not as much
> as a lot of us would like to believe, but still surely enough to keep it
> going.
>
> From a business point of view, they are thinking "How can we make MORE
> money for less cost". How do we make our business more efficient on a long
> term plan? The answer is quite simple, you unify all your efforts into one
> money making machine that will eventually be Maya 2.0. It will look very
> similar to Maya if not identical otherwise they wouldn't have bothered
> "transitioning us" now.
>
> Some people say "bad costumer service" but I guess the mayority of their
> costumers are Maya so we were a small price to pay...
>
> They knew there was going to be a loss of costume, but in 5 years time
> that frequently asked question "What 3D package should I learn?" will be
> totally irrelevant. They are putting their money on that "bright" future.
>
> Anyone want to bet which Adsk 3d software will die next? No brainer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Saturday, 8 March 2014, Chris Marshall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I couldn't agree more
>>
>> On Friday, 7 March 2014, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at things from another angle I am concerned with the whole
>>> decision because I don't understand it, abandoning Softimage seems such a
>>> bad decision...
>>>
>>> Can I ask you how many developers were working exclusively on the
>>> Softimage product? 6? 8? 12?
>>>
>>> Is that a crazy cost? let's face it, Autodesk is a huge corporation and
>>> we are talking about saving peanuts...
>>>
>>> Or am I dreaming here?
>>>
>>> Selling it would be a great option, and surely if the market share was
>>> so small would not have any impact whatsoever on your company.
>>>
>>> Jordi Bares
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Chris Marshall
>> Mint Motion Limited
>> 029 20 37 27 57
>> 07730 533 115
>> www.mintmotion.co.uk
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to