What I have seen of modo tool for UV work look very good. But then again I can imagine it a lot more expensive that headus. On Mar 9, 2014 11:28 PM, "Raffaele Fragapane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven't managed to crack Pixo one iota about ZB5, and it's not for lack > of trying. > Personally I think the "future" of ZBrush will be worth really speculating > about only when the 4 cycle stops and 5 begins. > With rumors of a legit 64bit client, proper topology support and so on it > should change the game enough I'm not going to bother wondering and > speculating until then. > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Jordi Bares <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Its amazing although the interface is very clunky... extremely good though. >> >> >> I wonder now that Zbrush is doing such an effort also on the UV front how >> does compare... :-/ >> >> Anyone? >> >> Jordi Bares >> [email protected] >> > >
