I doubt "The Mill" cares all that much. The artists might. Considering it's The Mill and they have the R&D infrastructure to make Softimage and ICE do what they need too....they could probably work for a long time with the current version as is. What is Autodesk going to bring to the table in the next 2 releases that the Mill couldn't easily create themselves.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:22 AM, adrian wyer < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > this; > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* 14 March 2014 15:03 > *To:* Morten Bartholdy; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: More XSI Monkey business by The Mill > > I wonder what the Mill think of all this debacle? > > Its so utterly ridiculous discontinuing Softimage. > > Its the best solution for designing complex character deformation bar none > in my opinion. > > Surely Autodesk aren't stupid enough to not be able to see that they have > a diamond here? > > 'Selling it as a particle system' my arse! I don't think they even know > what they have. > > Paul > > *From:* Morten Bartholdy <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 2:33 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* More XSI Monkey business by The Mill > > > While we are talking about why we want to keep using XSI, here goes > another very good reason: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQo0Qtr5iU8 > > > > > > Morten > > > > >
