If TheMill, Passion, Jellyfish, Psyop, .... don't want answer publicly to autodesk decision, then let their works speak for them. Come on, spread them around!
.........:......... Christian Lattuada On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Michal Doniec <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > > > On 14 March 2014 15:29, Chris Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I doubt "The Mill" cares all that much. The artists might. Considering >> it's The Mill and they have the R&D infrastructure to make Softimage and >> ICE do what they need too....they could probably work for a long time with >> the current version as is. What is Autodesk going to bring to the table in >> the next 2 releases that the Mill couldn't easily create themselves. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:22 AM, adrian wyer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> this; >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of * >>> [email protected] >>> *Sent:* 14 March 2014 15:03 >>> *To:* Morten Bartholdy; [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: More XSI Monkey business by The Mill >>> >>> I wonder what the Mill think of all this debacle? >>> >>> Its so utterly ridiculous discontinuing Softimage. >>> >>> Its the best solution for designing complex character deformation bar >>> none in my opinion. >>> >>> Surely Autodesk aren't stupid enough to not be able to see that they >>> have a diamond here? >>> >>> 'Selling it as a particle system' my arse! I don't think they even know >>> what they have. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> *From:* Morten Bartholdy <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 2:33 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* More XSI Monkey business by The Mill >>> >>> >>> While we are talking about why we want to keep using XSI, here goes >>> another very good reason: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQo0Qtr5iU8 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Morten >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > ---------- > Michal > http://uk.linkedin.com/in/mdoniec >
