Although you have to at least think Autodesk's marketing people might care when, in 2 years, The Mill comes out with some phenomenal project & it turns out it was done with the 1 DCC Autodesk decided to forcefully "retire".
At some point doesn't that become embarrassing? On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Chris Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt "The Mill" cares all that much. The artists might. Considering > it's The Mill and they have the R&D infrastructure to make Softimage and > ICE do what they need too....they could probably work for a long time with > the current version as is. What is Autodesk going to bring to the table in > the next 2 releases that the Mill couldn't easily create themselves. > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:22 AM, adrian wyer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> this; >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of * >> [email protected] >> *Sent:* 14 March 2014 15:03 >> *To:* Morten Bartholdy; [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: More XSI Monkey business by The Mill >> >> I wonder what the Mill think of all this debacle? >> >> Its so utterly ridiculous discontinuing Softimage. >> >> Its the best solution for designing complex character deformation bar >> none in my opinion. >> >> Surely Autodesk aren't stupid enough to not be able to see that they have >> a diamond here? >> >> 'Selling it as a particle system' my arse! I don't think they even know >> what they have. >> >> Paul >> >> *From:* Morten Bartholdy <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 2:33 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* More XSI Monkey business by The Mill >> >> >> While we are talking about why we want to keep using XSI, here goes >> another very good reason: >> >> >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQo0Qtr5iU8 >> >> >> >> >> >> Morten >> >> >> >> >> > >
