Me too...
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Martin Chatterjee < martin.chatterjee.li...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > *On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com > <car...@gmail.com>> wrote: * >> >> *thank you for posting this, i was struggling whether i should post >> something like this. i am just marking most threads as 'read' now because i >> can't follow and the attitudes make me not want to follow.* >> > > Yeah, my thoughts exactly... > > -M > > -- > Martin Chatterjee > > [ Freelance Technical Director ] > [ http://www.chatterjee.de ] > [ https://vimeo.com/chatterjee ] > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Raffaele Fragapane < >> raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> One simple post or comment I have no issues with, nor I think one has to >>> have a pedigree to post here, but when literally 80% of one's posts are >>> outbursts of insults and whining post EOL, and of that the absolute >>> totality is purely destructive and uninformed, I take issue with it, >>> because it ruins the list as a resource for me and many others who are >>> being silent about it and simply abandoned discussion, or even unsubscribed. >>> >>> This place has been a significant part of the professional network many >>> of us have built over much longer than just the last few weeks of turmoil, >>> and if AD is solely to be blamed for upsetting people with a hamfisted and >>> mismanaged move, the people have to take responsibility for making the >>> community itself poisonous and useless to others, like me, who would still >>> like to use it for something more useful than posting amateurish rants or >>> personal insults to valuable sources of information. >>> >>> Some BS was OK for a while. Some BS mixed with useful comments and >>> initiatives is OK pretty much all the time with me. All BS all the time >>> makes you worse than AD itself. >>> >>> As I said, that's my piece, I was aware when I wrote it many would have >>> disagreed, but I still decided to post it. >>> >>> >
