*On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com
<car...@gmail.com>> wrote:*
>
> *thank you for posting this, i was struggling whether i should post
> something like this. i am just marking most threads as 'read' now because i
> can't follow and the attitudes make me not want to follow.*
>
Yeah, my thoughts exactly...
-M
--
Martin Chatterjee
[ Freelance Technical Director ]
[ http://www.chatterjee.de ]
[ https://vimeo.com/chatterjee ]
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Raffaele Fragapane <
> raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> One simple post or comment I have no issues with, nor I think one has to
>> have a pedigree to post here, but when literally 80% of one's posts are
>> outbursts of insults and whining post EOL, and of that the absolute
>> totality is purely destructive and uninformed, I take issue with it,
>> because it ruins the list as a resource for me and many others who are
>> being silent about it and simply abandoned discussion, or even unsubscribed.
>>
>> This place has been a significant part of the professional network many
>> of us have built over much longer than just the last few weeks of turmoil,
>> and if AD is solely to be blamed for upsetting people with a hamfisted and
>> mismanaged move, the people have to take responsibility for making the
>> community itself poisonous and useless to others, like me, who would still
>> like to use it for something more useful than posting amateurish rants or
>> personal insults to valuable sources of information.
>>
>> Some BS was OK for a while. Some BS mixed with useful comments and
>> initiatives is OK pretty much all the time with me. All BS all the time
>> makes you worse than AD itself.
>>
>> As I said, that's my piece, I was aware when I wrote it many would have
>> disagreed, but I still decided to post it.
>>
>>
