Hi David,
I had a Skype call today from a chap from autodesk where it was confirmed
from the feedback they have received, the free student versions shall be
offered for another year (timeframe - iirc it was a year) to aid migration
of the education community.

I have certainly found this useful in our plans
J


On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jason S <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Yet I'm sure that a number of positive silver linings would come out of
> this in coming versions of Maya,
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On 03/27/14 16:36, Jason S wrote:
>
>
> Nad Center in Montreal is also hit pretty hard.. (among many)
>
>
> The thought of where XSI7 was heading,
> in that sense I can undestand what may have motivated the measures taken
> in consequence.
>
> Typical sentiment in Area Forum back then
>
> <<
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *  .. with programs like Houdini and XSI 7 (with ICE) gaining a lot of
> ground  in the development arena,  is Autodesk actually taking a hard look
> at Maya and making it more stable while providing new features? The
> underlying theme I get from people on forums is if Maya 2009 doesn't
> deliver or Autodesk doesn't lay out some sort of roadmap worthy of sticking
> around, people will in fact jump to XSI or Houdini.*
>
>
> Makes me wonder where XSI would be today, had it not been subject to Laws
> of the Jungle.
>
> I'm sure Maya would have been very much (if not more) alive & well...  as
> well..
> (having more reasons to keep-up)
>
>
> On 03/27/14 15:32, David Gallagher wrote:
>
> Hello! We will begin to remove Softimage assignment options,
> unfortunately, as it appears the students will no longer be able to
> download a student version, and we would be unwise to promote it for their
> sakes.
>
> We will continue to offer our more advanced rigs in Softimage to the
> animation students who may already have it, and our free, public rigs as
> well.
>
> I will continue to show Softimage's amazing capabilities to our students
> in my extra help sessions with the students.
>
> Thanks for the compliment!
> Dave G
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to