Hi Perry, I apologize for for the misunderstanding you then.
I'm trying to scrape together some $$ for copy of Modo; it looks really great. Cheers, -=Eric On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Perry Harovas <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I wasn't implying that Arnold (which I have also used) isn't something to > want in modo (in fact, just the opposite, I think it would be great to have > in modo). > I was just guessing that people wanting more renderers didn't necessarily > mean that the modo renderer isn't good. > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Gideon Klindt <[email protected]>wrote: > >> You can always render to final size with Preview if you want to just let >> it cook at X amount of time per frame and walk away from it. Obviously not >> a total solution given Preview doesn't run on a network (yet), but it's an >> option. >> >> I think comparing the MODO render engine to Arnold is kind of hard, given >> how differently they are tuned and focused. At least we can all agree >> neither is like mr, and that's a good thing IMHO. >> >> Nice little video by Andy Brown showing a few of the new features using >> schematic. Nothing earth shattering to the SI community, but illustrates >> the direction they wish to head and have been heading IMHO: >> >> http://community.thefoundry.co.uk/tv/training/view.aspx?id=774 >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Francisco Criado >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Would love to see redshift in modo! i got used to the speed of the >>> renderer... >>> F. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Gideon D. Klindt >> gideonklindt.com >> > > > > -- > > > > > > Perry Harovas > Animation and Visual Effects > > http://www.TheAfterImage.com <http://www.theafterimage.com/> > > -25 Years Experience > -Member of the Visual Effects Society (VES) > -- -=T=-
