Thanks for your feedback, Tim!
Personally I would just love to port emTopolizer and emPolygonizer to
Modo. The only thing that is missing in the Modo SDK is not
functionality but documentation and examples. Note that I have not taken
a look at Modo 801 yet.
I will get back to them as soon as I'm done with the stuff I'm currently
working on. Let's see how it goes.
Cheers,
Eric
Am 16.05.2014 19:46, schrieb Tim Crowson:
Eric your post on their forum a while back about lacking documentation
was very helpful for them realizing the effects of poor SDK
documentation. Others have reported the same thing, and I think
they've realized what they're missing out on (3rd party awesomeness =
more Modo seats). I'm optimistic that they'll put some real time into
this. I would definitely stay involved as you have time and continue
to give them feedback on what you need. They definitely need guidance
on what developers want to know and are looking for.
-Tim
On 5/16/2014 10:00 AM, Eric Mootz wrote:
Hey Sergio,
Good to hear. However I am more interested in the C++ API. Hopefully
they improved things there, too!
Cheers,
Eric
Am 16.05.2014 16:44, schrieb Sergio Mucino:
Eric. I'm not a developer, and I've only been using Modo for less
than a year, but it seems there has been some progress on that
front. I'd check it out for sure. At least on the Python side of
things, things are getting a lot nicer. 801 introduced some new user
classes that make it easier to work with the Python API. There's
still some holes left to cover, but I like how it's working.
Sergio Muciño.
Sent from my iPad.
--
Signature
