I'm using it for scans of my face for some reference, since its more precise then scanning with Kinect, and it does a pretty good job with 60 jpgs ( turntable, using a 1100D reflex ), even with my crappy 4 years old i7 2.7 Ghz in 15 minutes I have the scan ready, without any masking on the pictures, then directly into Zbrush for Zremesher and export :)
2014-06-04 16:36 GMT+02:00 Manuel Huertas Marchena <[email protected]>: > hope this link works: > > http://www.zbrushworkshops.com/content/jeffrey-wilsons-photogrammetry-webinar-replay?inf_contact_key=50b547bc23da9a70a5bec51783577fe7e0f16b49c92c9a6e534db770494136fd > > is an agisoft webinar, jeff wilson goes in detail into the difference > betwen versions if I am not wrong, > I am big fan of photogrammetry for environment creation but a bit new to > photoscan that video helped me > understand the process. > > you could also use 3dequalizer to generate a point cloud from stills or > even nuke 8 with the still solver/model builder > although I have yet to try that. > > The workflow I was used to is with image modeler but unfortunately its not > available anymore, although if you have access > to it with your autodesk subscription I would defintetly give it a try it > still does the job well. > > Regards > > > -Manu > > > > > IMDB <http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4755969/> | Portfolio > <http://envmanu.com> <http://envmanu.carbonmade.com/>| Vimeo > <http://vimeo.com/manuelhuertasmarchena> | Linkedin > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/manuelhuertas> > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:14:48 +0200 > > Subject: Re: Photogrammetry - what do you use? > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > depends on what you want to do. > > I think the main difference to the professional version is the ability to > orient the scene and to do 4D mesh generation (from video input). > > cheers, > vincent > > > > 2014-06-04 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jens Lindgren <[email protected]>: > > Thread resurrection time! > So I got a project that needs some photogrammetry and I'm looking at > Agisoft PhotosScan right now. Only have one question: Standard or > Professional? The price difference is huge! > > /Jens > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Francisco Criado <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Octavian, i used a couple of times skanect for people or indoor sets > and must say its a time saver. If you can, give it a try! > > Francisco. > > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Octavian Ureche <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interesting topic here. > Was just testing agisoft photoscan for some non commercial related work, > and it seems to give pretty nice results with minimal user input. > Has anyone tried to compare a kinekt based approach such as skanect ( > http://skanect.manctl.com) with a photogrammetrical approach for object > scanning? > > I am curious about the pros and cons of both. > > Cheers, > O > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Ed Manning <[email protected]> wrote: > > Recap and 123D Catch from Autodesk do very well with some subject matter. > > NukeX also has camera tracking, point-could generation and meshing, and > can export geo and camera. > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello friends, > > > > I am currently investigating photogrammetry and would love to get your > advices, opinions, experiences with such systems. > > What hardware do you use? Which software? Best practices? > > > > Thank you for any info! > > MAC > > > > > > [image: cid:[email protected]] > <https://mdc-web-tomcat17.ubisoft.org/confluence/display/technologygroup/Home+Passenger> > > *Marc-André Carbonneau* > > Product Specialist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Octavian Ureche > +40 732 774 313 (GMT+2) > Animation & Visual Effects > www.okto.ro > > > > > -- > Jens Lindgren > -------------------------- > Lead Technical Director > Magoo 3D Studios <http://www.magoo3dstudios.com/> > > > > > -- > Vincent Langer > Uhlandstr. 29 > 71638 Ludwigsburg > +49 176 965 177 61 > www.vincentlanger.com >
