Regarding Modo, found this site:
http://www.sabertoothproductions.com/late-night-animator-blog/2014/6/3/welcome-to-the-late-night-animator-blog

The river-eco system is very nice :-)


Rob

\/-------------\/----------------\/

On 15-7-2014 18:32, Serch Mucino wrote:
Modo has the nicest schematic view I've had the pleasure of using, after ICE. It still needs some work (it lacks any form of layout and management tools), but I believe this will change soon. Modo's schematic is based on "workspaces". These are basically viewports that provide a view into a part of the scene. You can drag anything you need into them, and see only relevant nodes for whatever you're working on. You can have as many workspaces as you need. You can graph node relationships, shaders, particle simulations, dynamic simulations, etc. Modo still lacks a bit in support for certain types of nodes (not much available in the matrix department), and there is no exposure yet for mesh data, but as soon as that is supported, you'll be able to do a lot of what's available in ICE. I can already do everything that I could do with ICE kinematics (considering the limitations... like no matrix math nodes), which is a lot. I've actually been replicating some of ICE's compounds as Assemblies in Modo (Modo's term for a compound), I have a bunch of videos I've been doing in the past few months, and in a lot of them, I use the schematic view. So, if you're curious, you can check some more here...

https://vimeo.com/maxtd/videos

----
Sergio Mucino



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Angus Davidson <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    For those folks who haven’t seen them in action  you can have a
    look at the videos at

    http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/products/modo/latest-version/

    Its like a great playpen. If you want to can drag what your
    interested into the workspace and just start exploring,

    To me it makes me want to use them , rather then trying to avoid it.



    From: Sebastien Sterling <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Reply-To: "[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>"
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 at 5:52 PM
    To: "[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>"
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    Subject: Re: Maya 2015 Node Editor

    Really Angus ? do tell of these Modo nodes :)


    On 15 July 2014 16:47, Angus Davidson <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I don靖 think that is a solution at all. Ice has a workflow
        and the ice
        node editor compliments it very well. It doesn靖 mean its the
        right thing
        for the maya Node editor though. The main issue in Maya is
        actually
        defining what it is would be useful for people to be spending
        their time
        doing in a new Node editor 2.0

        That been said , working in Modo零 nodes are a absolute joy ;)



        On 2014/07/15, 5:29 PM, "Gerbrand Nel" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        >well, you could make it work like ice :P
        >On 2014/07/15 05:07 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
        >> Define "make it better"?
        >>
        >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Eric Mootz
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        >>> Thanks, guys.
        >>> I had already used the node editor in Maya 2014 and yes,
        it is far
        >>>better
        >>> than the hypergraph, but still... it's not good at all.
        Had hoped that
        >>>they
        >>> would make that better, but no.
        >>>
        >

        <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"
        style="width:100%;">
        <tr>
        <td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font
        face="arial,sans-serif" size="1" color="#999999"><span
        style="font-size:11px;">This communication is intended for the
        addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this
        communication in error, please notify us immediately and
        destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate
        this communication without the permission of the University.
        Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into
        agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus
        advised that the content of this message may not be legally
        binding on the University and may contain the personal views
        and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the
        views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand,
        Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and
        outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the
        University agrees in writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
        </tr>
        </table>



    This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is
    confidential. If you have received this communication in error,
    please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You
    may not copy or disseminate this communication without the
    permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are
    competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and
    recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may
    not be legally binding on the University and may contain the
    personal views and opinions of the author, which are not
    necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the
    Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University
    and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the
    University agrees in writing to the contrary.


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2014.0.4716 / Virus Database: 3986/7855 - Release Date: 07/15/14


Reply via email to