I might be taking back what I said about Zoner. I've been testing it & FastStone today, along with continuing to use Bridge. Zoner honestly does a really good job of being not just a fewer, but an organizer. It's basically a cross between Bridge, Lightroom and XnView.
It handles video, vectors, and all the normal bitmap formats. It also doesn't choke on HDRs - which Bridge can do. And, it has no problem with network drives. Although their website looked very spammy, I'm fairly impressed with it. The only real negative I can come up with at the moment is, the organizational options are limited to just "favorites". I'd like to be able to create collections the way you can in Bridge. But beyond that, it's certainly worth a look. -Paul On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Stephen Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > For quick video viewing, I use DJView > > http://windjview.sourceforge.net/ > > I leave it on my desktop as an icon, and just drag the video file from my > file browser onto the > DJView icon. The reason that I like it, is because it will deal with a > series of stills (even Softimage .pic files) > > I hope you find that useful. > > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Paul Griswold < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Doing a little research this afternoon. Xnview has one big problem as >> far as I can tell. If you try to favorite a network folder, it favorites >> it, but when you click on the favorite it freaks out and takes you to >> SkyDrive instead. Since all my images, textures, etc., are all on a >> server, that puts Xnview out of the picture. >> >> Irfranview doesn't seem to have any organization tools at all, but it's >> still a great little image viewer. >> >> Zoner Photo Studio came up in some searches. The first negative I see >> is, they require you to sign up to their website just to get the free >> version. It feels very pro-sumer in how they present it, but maybe that's >> just my impression. It's got a nice, Lightroom-like interface, but I'm >> just concerned it's one of those programs that attaches adware to your >> system, sells your email address, etc.... again - that's just the vibe I'm >> getting. >> >> FastStone Image Viewer was listed as an alternative to ACDSee. I've >> never heard of it & have no opinion. I might give it a try. It can be >> found here: http://www.faststone.org/FSViewerDetail.htm >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Paul Griswold < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I forgot about Xnview. I think it has some decent features. I'm not >>> sure if it handles video, though. >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Martin Yara <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> A few years ago I was using Windows Photo Gallery or Live Gallery or >>>> something like that, can't remember the name, a free app from Microsoft. >>>> >>>> It was interesting. I was creating my own texture library with tags, >>>> keywords and categories, but I couldn't finish it. It's just too much work. >>>> >>>> For just visualizing images I use Irfanview too. >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > > Best Regards, > * Stephen P. Davidson* > > *(954) 552-7956 <%28954%29%20552-7956>* [email protected] > > *Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic* > > > - Arthur C. Clarke > > <http://www.3danimationmagic.com> >
