Then I'd like change "we"with "me" in my statement if you feel more comfortable 
with it. I do respect you the same way as I respect the list. This list is the 
most proficient source of information in a same way a platform for 
professionals is meant to discuss even everything else. That’s my point.  This 
is the softimage mailing list. I read maya topics all the time. 3Dsmax, for 
gods sake and will tolerate it. And Houdini? Well, it's very welcome and Modo 
for sure. But discusing freeware? C'mon!

Well the problem I had was not actually arguing with specific modeling in 
Blender but the promotion of it in this list. I do not think this is the right 
place to promote software.

 

sven

 

From:  <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected] [ 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Thivierge
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 11:19 PM
To:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
Subject: Re: Is purchasing a new softimage license impossible?

 

Hey Sven,

I'm not sure you have the right to police this list like that. I don't mind if 
this kind of stuff is posted here. So when you use the word "we" I'm not sure 
who you're speaking for but it certainly isn't the whole of this list.

Anyone wanting to share new ways of working and tools should be able to. This 
wasn't forbidden before the EOL for Softimage so it shouldn't be now. 
Especially since the EOL.

Eric T.

On 5/14/2015 5:10 PM, Sven Constable wrote:

Hey Chris, we have some problem if people want to promote their software in a 
inappropriate way. ADSK did this this on the list. Newtek an SideFX did it as 
well. It's alright. But please keep in mind, this is the softimage mailing list.

If I want to model with hobbyist software, controlled by hobbyists I will 
choose Blender. If you want to promote a software for hobbyists, you should use 
the appropiate forums.   

 

sven

 

Reply via email to